Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A recent move toward plain-language commercial boat policies is a useful sign for Australian vessel owners who have long found marine insurance wording difficult to navigate. NTI launched a plain-language Commercial Boat policy on 10 August 2026, aimed at smaller and less complex commercial vessels, while Proteus Marine Insurance had already moved in a similar direction with plain English commercial hull wording updated from 6 July 2026. - read more
Australias general insurance sector is moving further into implementation planning for an updated General Insurance Code of Practice, keeping claims conduct, customer communication and support for vulnerable policyholders firmly in focus. For boat owners, this is not just a compliance issue for insurers. It is a reminder that the value of boat insurance is often judged during the most stressful moments: after a collision, storm loss, theft, fire, grounding or marina incident. - read more
Fresh boating safety messaging from the Australian Maritime Safety Authority is a practical reminder that risk management starts long before a vessel leaves the ramp, marina or mooring. While the safety focus is naturally on protecting lives, the same habits can also make a meaningful difference when Australian boat owners need to rely on their insurance. - read more
Fresh global marine risk reporting has again highlighted a useful contrast for Australian boat owners: major vessel losses may be improving over the long term, but the risks that drive insurance claims are becoming more complex. - read more
Australias general insurance sector is continuing to sharpen its focus on customer protections, with industry attention now turning from consultation to the practical impact of updated code standards. For boat owners, this is more than a technical compliance story. The way an insurer explains cover, handles a claim and communicates during a stressful incident can determine whether a policy feels valuable or disappointing when it matters most. - read more
Where your boat is kept, how it is secured and how it is transported can affect boat insurance cover, exclusions and claims. This guide explains common storage, mooring, trailering, navigation and lay-up conditions Australian boat owners should check before they rely on a policy. - read more
As boating enthusiasts, it's crucial to recognize the significant impact we have on our environment. Australia's beautiful waterways and marine life depend on our commitment to eco-friendly practices. - read more
When it comes to insuring your beloved boat, an insurance broker can be a valuable asset in finding the right coverage for your unique needs. Specifically, a specialist boat insurance broker can offer expert knowledge and tailored policies that traditional insurance agents may not be able to provide. - read more
As a recreational boat owner in Australia, you are responsible for ensuring the safety of your vessel and passengers. This is where boat insurance comes in to play. Boat insurance is a type of insurance policy that can provide financial protection against damage to your boat, theft, and injury to passengers. - read more
Using a boat for income, hire, charter, tours or other business activity can change the type of marine insurance cover you need. Learn how recreational and commercial boat insurance differ in Australia, what insurers may ask, and why disclosure matters. - read more
Knowledgebase
Grace Period: A set amount of time after the premium is due during which a policyholder can make a payment without the insurance coverage lapsing.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.